历史与人物salon.com
克格勃如何在实地识别中情局特工
The KGB’s success identifying CIA agents in the field
2015 — 2022，它一次次回到首页
黑点是上首页（≥ 50 分）的那次投稿，空心点是没冲上去的投稿，点越大分数越高。
导读
这篇 Salon 文章探讨冷战期间克格勃为何能较成功地识别中情局驻外特工，重点不在传奇技术，而在官僚系统的规律性：外交/官方掩护、人员与后勤记录、掩护机构的注册和通讯方式等都会留下可被交叉比对的模式。文章也涉及这种识别对情报行动和外交关系的后果，以及相关做法在今天数字环境中的变化。
为什么经久不衰：它把间谍战还原为官僚制度与模式识别问题：制度性规律比传奇手段更持久，也能解释为什么数字时代的身份掩护反而更难。
HN 评论精选
官方身份的情报官常被驻在国掌握，关键疑问是苏联为何选择此时‘烧掉’已知人员，评论者认为是体制末期的政治清洗。
其中最重要的一点，是克格勃如何轻易识别出部署在全球、以外交身份和深度掩护身份活动的驻外官员。秘密行动圈里一个不光彩的小秘密是：大多数有官方身份（外交或军事掩护）的情报官，东道国情报机构其实都知道。原因是持续收集工作不能冒太大风险，例如以外交身份过海关、参加官方外交宴会等通常都会给当地人留下记录；真正的收集发生在‘业余时间’，但即便如此，能接触到掌握高度专业情报的合适对象的机会也很低。多数情报官清楚这一点，这最终成了一种政治舞蹈：谁在收集时冒险过头，谁就会被标记并宣布为不受欢迎的人。真正的问题是，苏联为什么当时决定烧掉它已知的情报官——这会引发对等报复，消耗资源并严重损害外交关系。我认为答案很清楚：那是垂死体制的最后挣扎，他们尽其所能清洗并争夺权力。如果了解这套系统如何运作，这里没什么特别令人震惊或复杂的东西。
AndrewKemendo查看英文原文
The most important of which was how officers in the field under diplomatic and deep cover stationed across the globe were readily identified by the KGB. A dirty little secret within the world of clandestine operations is that the majority of official-status officers (diplomatic or military cover) are known by the host country intelligence services. This is largely because you generally only take so much risk with ongoing collection efforts, for example going through customs and attending official diplomatic functions (dinners etc...) under status is typical and gives the locals a record. What they do in their "off time" is the real collection work, but even then their chance of gaining access to well placed contacts that have very specialized intelligence is low. The majority of officers know this, and it ends up being a political dance, where if someone gets too risky with their collection they get tagged and persona-non-grata'd. The real question here is why the Soviets decided at that time to burn the officers that it knew about - because that turns into a tit-for-tat across waters that eats up resources and really strains diplomatic relations. I think the answer is very clear in that it was the last gasp of a dying system, so they were doing what they could to purge and wrest power. Nothing particularly shocking or complicated here if you know how the system works.
社交媒体让现代情报人员因自我暴露和关系网络而更容易被识别。
今天的问题是，有了 LinkedIn 和 Facebook，一些中情局人员蠢到真的会提到自己在机构里的身份，或者与公开说明身份的中情局分析员成为好友/联系人。NSA 承包商有时也会在 LinkedIn 页面上提到机密代号。
neurotech1查看英文原文
The problem today is that with LinkedIn and Facebook, some CIA personnel are stupid enough to actually mention their status with the Agency, or are friends/connections with known CIA Analysts etc. who do mention their status. NSA Contractors sometimes mention classified codenames in their LinkedIn page. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/13482623512/discovering-names-secret-nsa-surveillance-programs-via-linkedin.shtml
克格勃的方法可理解为对人事与记录做‘流量分析’，从模式中推断组织结构和人员角色。
这是把流量分析用在休假、晋升和档案记录上：二阶效应能指示一阶功能。如果你能拿到电话簿并追踪其变化，而上面又有职位名称，你大概能重建某个机构的历史、哪个党派掌权等等，还能看出长期任职者的角色和职业路径；短期来去的人也会透露不少信息。我敢打赌，如果能拿到电话簿，仅凭名字就能识别出进出前十机构、挂在 CEO 办公室并在不同岗位间流动的麦肯锡雇员。
ggm查看英文原文
Traffic analysis but applied to leave, advancement and record keeping. Second order effects indicative of first order function. If you can obtain the telephone directory and track it over time and it has job titles you can probably reconstruct the history of IBM, which party is in power, whatever, for the institution which publishes it. And what the role and career progression is for the longterm players. What does it tell you about the short term players? Maybe as much if they come and go. I bet you could identify McKinsey hires coming and going from top 10 institutions by their name as they are attached to the CEOs office and move between roles, if you can get the phone book.
推荐米特罗欣档案，并指出数字互联与 OSINT 使传统假身份卧底越来越难。
想多看这类内容并配有精彩轶事，我推荐米特罗欣档案来源的两本书：《剑与盾》（1999）和《世界正走向我们的方式：克格勃与第三世界争夺》（2005）。这是覆盖一个多世纪、从革命前到各大洲行动的惊人资料。第一本书深入讨论了这类主题，包括双重、三重乃至四重间谍。我很喜欢其中关于在敌对状态下准备在美国东海岸进行大规模破坏的部分，我之前完全不知道，那会是非常大胆的举动；书里也有很多蠢得难以置信的事情。书中提到，在现代数字互联世界里，任何卧底或假身份行动都变得更难；那些卧底手段如今基本已成过去，OSINT 几乎能查到任何人的任何事。
danielodievich查看英文原文
For someone wanting a bit more of this with great anecdotes, I direct you to the Mitrokhin Archive (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitrokhin_Archive) sourced pair of tomes (The Sword and the Shield (1999) and The World Was Going Our Way: The KGB and the Battle for the Third World (2005)). An incredible source covering more than a century of operations, predating the revolution, and spanning all continents. The first book dives quite deeply into this exact topics, with double, triple and sometimes quadruple crossings. I loved the part about the prep for large-scale sabotage in eastern seaboard of USA in the events of hostilities, something I had no idea about but would have been quite an bold move. There was also a lot of unbelievably dumb stuff. The book mentions the increased difficulty of doing anything undercover or assumed identity in the modern digitally connected world. All of those undercover things are pretty much the thing of the past now, with OSINT being able to find just about anything about anyone.
历次讨论
同类还值得读
开发者无薪坚持完成 Mac 图形计算器：一个秘密项目的故事
Dev stays without pay to finish Mac Graphing Calculator as skunkworks project
苹果 Mac 图形计算器（Graphing Calculator）开发者的亲述：在项目被砍后，几位工程师在没有报酬、没有正式授权的情况下，以“地下项目”方式偷偷留在公司把软件做完…
历史与人物上首页 6 次 · 2009–2022pacifict.com理查德·费曼与 Connection Machine
Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine
长文回忆费曼晚年参与 Connection Machine 并行计算机项目的经历：他分析路由器、用自创的并行 Basic 编写 QCD 程序，也涉足细胞自动机等主题。
历史与人物上首页 5 次 · 2010–2021longnow.org编辑精选负 2000 行代码
-2000 Lines of Code
folklore.org 上 Andy Hertzfeld 记录的一则苹果 Macintosh 开发轶事：Bill Atkinson 被问到写了多少行代码时，回答“-2000 行…
历史与人物上首页 4 次 · 2014–2022folklore.org编辑精选Dennis Ritchie 的第一版 C 编译器（约 1972 年）
Dennis Ritchie’s first C compiler (c. 1972)
这个 GitHub 仓库保存了 Dennis Ritchie 约 1972 年编写的最早 C 编译器源码，是 C 语言和 Unix 早期历史的一手材料。
历史与人物上首页 4 次 · 2013–2025github.com一位破解赛马密码的赌徒
A Gambler Who Cracked the Horse-Racing Code (2018)
彭博社 2018 年的长篇特写，讲述数学家 Bill Benter 如何用统计模型和算法在赛马博彩中持续盈利、累计赢得近十亿美元的故事。
历史与人物上首页 4 次 · 2018–2024bloomberg.com