安全与隐私phrack.org
Phrack 第 69 期发布
Phrack 69 released
2016 — 2021，它一次次回到首页
黑点是上首页（≥ 50 分）的那次投稿，空心点是没冲上去的投稿，点越大分数越高。
导读
Phrack 第69期发布，这是历史悠久的黑客技术杂志。本期包含《The Fall of Hacker Groups》等文章，评论怀念其少见的技术深度和旧式出版物风格。
为什么经久不衰：它延续了自1985年以来的硬核技术写作传统，在自我推销式博客泛滥的今天仍显得珍贵。
HN 评论精选
赞叹 Phrack 的技术深度，并惋惜同类内容稀少。
哇，没想到会看到这个，已经有一阵子了。Phrack 的技术深度在 HN 上不常见，可惜现在做这类内容的人太少了。
wcummings查看英文原文
Whoa, wasn't expecting to see this, it's been a while. Phrack has a technical depth you don't often see on HN, it's a shame there aren't more people producing content like this.
喜欢这种非自我推销的出版物风格，并提供防火墙镜像。
今天看到这个太高兴了。我怀念这种写作和出版风格，在如今多是自我推销、假装有信息量的博客噪音里。希望他们继续更新 paper feed 并发布新刊。给被公司防火墙挡住 phrack.org 的人准备了镜像：http://paste.click/s/amfVqd
Tiksi查看英文原文
I am so happy to see this today. I've missed this style of writing and publication in today's noise of mostly self promoting blog posts pretending to be informational. Hopefully they keep up with the paperfeed and continue to release issues. Mirrored for anyone behind a corp firewall that might block phrack.org: http://paste.click/s/amfVqd
借文章结论反思黑客群体因个人主义而难以合作。
《The Fall of Hacker Groups》的结论……让我想起罗素的一句话：“即便是那些自认为有万灵药的聪明人，也过于个人主义，不愿与在次要问题上意见相左的其他聪明人合作。”即使知道这很傻也改变不了，这更像根深蒂固的习惯，但值得记在心里。
PavlovsCat查看英文原文
The conclusion of the article titled "The Fall of Hacker Groups"... > Furthermore, we dread the thought of being alike, of sharing multiple views and opinions. As such, we are turning progressively judgemental of who we should be partnering with, on the basis that "they do not understand". [..] No one ever feels like we do. They are not to be trusted and we do not have the time for them. The only attitude consonant to our search for a comfortable, safe life is to constrain ourselves to our own limitations, ignore the intelligent life out there, and surrender to the mediocracy that our society has condemned our leisure time to. ...reminded me of this: > Even those of the intelligent who believe that they have a nostrum are too individualistic to combine with other intelligent men from whom they differ on minor points. ( from http://russell-j.com/0583TS.HTM ) Even knowing this, and knowing it's silly, doesn't really change it; it's a more ingrained habit than that, at least for me. But it's worth a mental note to self and those whom it may concern :)
整理 Phrack 历年 HN 讨论帖链接。
如果想看，以前的讨论帖：Phrack Magazine (1985-2016)……这些都是关于 Phrack 整体的。我略去了具体文章的帖子，只留了一个短而有趣评论的。
dang查看英文原文
If curious, past threads: Phrack Magazine (1985-2016) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18288767 - Oct 2018 (73 comments) Phrack 69 released - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11644340 - May 2016 (56 comments) Phrack Issue #68 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3841721 - April 2012 (50 comments) Phrack Magazine's classic article on OS/kernel development - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2583591 - May 2011 (3 comments) Phrack 66 (June 2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=744821 - Aug 2009 (9 comments) Phrack #66 is out - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=652545 - June 2009 (14 comments) Those are all about Phrack in general. I omitted threads about specific articles, except one because it's short and has a fun comment.
历次讨论
同类还值得读
非法素数
Illegal prime
维基百科条目，介绍“非法素数”：某些素数之所以被称为“非法”，是因为它们经特定编码后，恰好对应一段被法律禁止传播的数据——最著名的是 DVD 解密程序 DeCSS 的代码，有人把…
安全与隐私上首页 5 次 · 2010–2021en.wikipedia.org编辑精选关于 /dev/urandom 的常见误区
Myths about /dev/urandom
（Thomas Hühn 撰写，2014 年首发并持续更新）逐条反驳关于 /dev/urandom 的常见误解：它与 /dev/random 使用的是同一个 CSPRNG，一旦完…
安全与隐私上首页 5 次 · 2014–20202uo.de编辑精选AES 高级加密标准火柴人图解
A Stick Figure Guide to the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
一篇用火柴人漫画形式讲解 AES（高级加密标准）算法的经典科普文章。
安全与隐私上首页 5 次 · 2009–2022moserware.com编辑精选指纹是用户名，不是密码
Fingerprints are Usernames, not Passwords
作者（eCryptfs 维护者、Ubuntu 安全工程师）认为指纹等生物特征是公开、不可更改的标识，应视作用户名而非密码，不能当作秘密凭据用于认证。
安全与隐私上首页 4 次 · 2013–2017blog.dustinkirkland.comHTTPS 连接的最初几毫秒（2009）
The First Few Milliseconds of an HTTPS Connection (2009)
逐毫秒拆解一次 HTTPS 连接建立时发生了什么，重点讲 TLS 握手、证书验证、RSA 签名与密钥协商等机制，面向不熟悉该领域的读者。
安全与隐私上首页 4 次 · 2009–2020moserware.com编辑精选