HackerURLs

一次又一次被重新发现的经典。

同一个链接,相隔一年以上,一次又一次被人重新发现、再次冲上 Hacker News 首页。能经受住这种时间检验的,大多是值得一读再读的文章。每篇附中文标题,讨论最热的那些再加上中文导读和高赞评论翻译。

从名人堂开始
  • 4,700+篇经过时间检验的经典

Hall of fame

名人堂

在经典库里看全部精选

上首页次数最多、而且有中文导读的 30 篇。时间轴上每个黑点是一次上首页,空心点是一次没冲上去的投稿。

  1. 正在载入经典…

Archive

经典库

按第一次上首页的年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些经典是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      合并同一个链接

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部链接投稿,把 http/https、www、跟踪参数等写法不同的同一篇文章合并成一条。

    2. 02

      只留经得起时间的

      同一链接至少两次拿到 50 分以上(约等于上首页),而且两次相隔一年以上;再由 AI 剔除状态页、产品首页和新闻事件。

    3. 03

      写导读、译评论

      上首页次数最多的 2,000 篇配上中文导读、"为什么经久不衰",并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。导读由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    科学与数学aging.nautil.us

    心态与变老之间的关系

    The relationship between mindset and getting old

    2次上首页
    3年跨度
    542累计得分
    239条评论

    2017 — 2020,它一次次回到首页

    黑点是上首页(≥ 50 分)的那次投稿,空心点是没冲上去的投稿,点越大分数越高。

    导读

    这篇文章介绍了心理学家 Ellen Langer 著名的“逆龄实验”:她把一座修道院布置成 1959 年的样子,让一群八旬老人像二十年前那样生活一周,结果他们在身体指标和心理状态上都出现了年轻化的改善。文章由此探讨心态、环境暗示与衰老之间的关系。

    为什么经久不衰:它挑战了“衰老纯粹是生理过程”的直觉,提醒读者社会期待和自我认知如何塑造我们变老的方式,对任何担心年龄的人都有启发。

    关键词 心理学衰老Ellen Langer社会规训

    HN 评论精选

    从生化角度解释:心态变化通过激素水平影响身体状态

    我怀疑他们感觉更有活力,是因为心态和环境的变化改变了他们的生化状态。我们的感受和自我认知会影响睾酮、皮质醇、血清素等水平——哪怕五分钟的对话就能让睾酮提升 30% 以上,而感觉自己被视作高地位也会改变血清素。这些激素反过来让人更有活力。所以谁知道真正原因是什么……也许是和陌生人更多的社交?或者只是心态被放到了一个不同的、更好的地方?

    michalu查看英文原文

    I suspect the reason they felt better and more vital is that the change of mindset and environment altered their biochemistry. How we feel and what we think of ourselves affects our levels of Testosterone, Cortisol, Serotonin, etc. Even a 5 minute conversation can give you a T boost of 30%+ ... or believing that you're perceived as high status alters your Serotonin. Those hormones in turn make you more vital. So who knows what was the reason... maybe more social interaction with strangers? Or simply putting their mind into a different, better place? http://www.ulm.edu/~palmer/TheBiochemistryofStatusandtheFunctionofMoodStates.htm http://www.cep.ucsb.edu/topics/courtship/roney%20et%20al_2009_proceedings%20b.pdf

    变老很大程度是社会规训,而非生理必然

    有意思的是看看这其中多少是真正的生理因素,多少来自社会和情境的规训。二十多岁时我能做的很多事(比如拒绝坐燃油车、拒绝用一次性餐具),到了三十多岁就做不了了,因为周围人会觉得我是个固执的傻子,危及尚未站稳的事业。工作时间我基本被迫“正常”、套进社会的模子里,只有晚上和周末才能做自己。

    dheera查看英文原文

    It would be interesting to see how much of this is truly biological and how much of it is due to societal and situational conditioning. There were lots of things I could do in my 20s (e.g. refuse to use gasoline-powered city transportation, refuse to patronize places that used disposable cutlery, refuse to use non-free software, etc.) that I can't do when I'm in my 30s because people around me would think I'm a stubborn idiot, jeopardizing my career at a point where I have not yet established myself. It's very easy to tell a colleague, advisor, anyone at school that you're going to bike to the destination or take electric-powered transit [because you don't believe in a fossil fuel future]. It's very difficult to say the same thing to an investor, co-founder, employee, customer, or whoever is offering you a ride in their car, without feeling like an ass. I'm basically forced to be "normal" during work times and fit into the mould of society. I can only be myself on evenings and weekends. I can only imagine how much more "being normal" I need to do if I had kids, pets, tenants, or whatever. I don't have any of those at the moment. The other night I was pondering over potential improvements to our music and mathematical notation systems while staring at the Milky Way. (I didn't come to anything conclusive, but I love thinking outside the boxes that society defines for us.) 10 years ago, I could truly be myself 24 hours a day. I was basically learning all kinds of things about the world by doing that. Now, I only get about 5 hours a day to be myself. The rest of the time, I need to conform. The lack of "me" time itself may be contribute to some degree of mental rot/aging, apart from the biological component.

    老年亲历者:保持对新事物的好奇心是抗老关键

    七十多岁的老人现身说法:身体衰退没什么办法,但唯一容易带进老年的(只要没有失智或重病)是协调性——人可以虚弱却依然优雅。至于心态,关键看它何时“冻结”:如果你总拿现在和“过去的好时光”比较,那多半已经迷失;但只要对新事物还有胃口(比如 Hacker News),就还有希望。

    every查看英文原文

    Old person here (+7 decades). Not much you can do about physical deterioration. The only thing I've found you can easily carry into old age is (assuming no senility or debilitating disease) coordination. One can be weak and frail yet still somewhat graceful. As for the mind, it depends on when it freezes in time. If you find yourself comparing everything current to the "good old days", then you are probably lost. But as long as you have an appetite for the new and unfamiliar (maybe something like ycombinator) then there is possibly still hope...

    质疑该经典实验缺乏可重复性

    这个研究被复制过吗?每次看到心理学研究被记者写成流行文章,我都会起疑心。

    RcouF1uZ4gsC查看英文原文

    > psychologist Ellen Langer and her students carefully refurbished an old monastery in Peterborough, New Hampshire, to resemble a place that would have existed two decades earlier. They invited a group of elderly men in their late 70s and early 80s to spend a week with them and live as they did in 1959, Has this study been replicated? Every time I see a psychology study that is used as the basis of some popular article by some journalist, I get suspicious.

    历次讨论

    同类还值得读

    1. 如果月球只有 1 像素:一个极其精确的太阳系模型(2014)

      If the moon were only 1 pixel: A tediously accurate solar system model (2014)

      一个网页版太阳系模型,以“如果月亮只有 1 像素”的真实比例呈现:你必须一路横向滚动,才能体会行星之间空旷到何等程度。

      科学与数学上首页 7 次 · 2014–2025joshworth.com编辑精选
    2. 沉浸式线性代数(2016)

      Immersive Linear Algebra (2016)

      《Immersive Linear Algebra》是一本完全免费、开放在线的线性代数“超文本教科书”,其最大特色是大量可交互的图形:读者可以直接拖动、操作图中的向量、矩阵和变换…

      科学与数学上首页 5 次 · 2015–2024immersivemath.com编辑精选
    3. 如何将贝果切成两个相连的半环(2009)

      How to Slice a Bagel into Two Linked Halves (2009)

      数学家 George Hart 的经典教程,演示如何用一刀把贝果切成两个相互扣住的环,并附上切割步骤与数学原理。

      科学与数学上首页 5 次 · 2009–2022georgehart.com
    4. “犹太问题”:一组用于歧视的数学题

      Jewish problems

      一篇 arXiv 论文,整理并讨论苏联时期犹太学生在申请大学数学系时被问到的特殊数学难题:这些题往往有简单解法却极难想到,被用作面试中拒绝犹太考生的手段。

      科学与数学上首页 5 次 · 2011–2021arxiv.org
    5. 你的身体并非为长久而造:人类死亡率数据的一课

      Your body wasn’t built to last: a lesson from human mortality rates

      文章从人类死亡率随年龄变化的统计规律出发,解释身体并非为长久使用而设计:年轻时死亡风险较低,之后随年龄近似指数上升,像复杂系统在不断累积损伤。

      科学与数学上首页 5 次 · 2009–2018gravityandlevity.wordpress.com

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。