HackerURLs

一次又一次被重新发现的经典。

同一个链接,相隔一年以上,一次又一次被人重新发现、再次冲上 Hacker News 首页。能经受住这种时间检验的,大多是值得一读再读的文章。每篇附中文标题,讨论最热的那些再加上中文导读和高赞评论翻译。

从名人堂开始
  • 4,700+篇经过时间检验的经典

Hall of fame

名人堂

在经典库里看全部精选

上首页次数最多、而且有中文导读的 30 篇。时间轴上每个黑点是一次上首页,空心点是一次没冲上去的投稿。

  1. 正在载入经典…

Archive

经典库

按第一次上首页的年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些经典是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      合并同一个链接

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部链接投稿,把 http/https、www、跟踪参数等写法不同的同一篇文章合并成一条。

    2. 02

      只留经得起时间的

      同一链接至少两次拿到 50 分以上(约等于上首页),而且两次相隔一年以上;再由 AI 剔除状态页、产品首页和新闻事件。

    3. 03

      写导读、译评论

      上首页次数最多的 2,000 篇配上中文导读、"为什么经久不衰",并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。导读由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    思考与写作gwern.net编辑精选

    1990 年代以来生活质量的改善

    Life Improvements Since the 1990s

    2次上首页
    1年跨度
    806累计得分
    659条评论

    2020 — 2021,它一次次回到首页

    黑点是上首页(≥ 50 分)的那次投稿,空心点是没冲上去的投稿,点越大分数越高。

    导读

    这篇文章是 Gwern 对 1990 年代以来生活各方面改善的清单式梳理,涵盖技术、健康、环境、便利性等,并回应“过去更好”的怀旧叙事。它试图用具体变化说明许多进步已经融入日常、不易察觉。

    为什么经久不衰:它把散落在日常中的长期改善集中呈现,同时保留可讨论的争议与反例,今天仍适合用来校准我们对进步的判断。

    关键词 生活改善长期趋势技术进步怀旧批判

    HN 评论精选

    现代通信技术让专业设计/工程渗透到更多产品,整体产品优化被低估。

    我认为他有点忽略了现代通信技术这头大象:它降低了专业服务的边际成本,使得几乎每一件在办公室设计、在工厂制造的产品都能受益于更广泛的工程与设计专业人士和方法。今天普通经济参与者接触的产品和服务,其设计和优化程度远高于历史上。

    throwaway0a5e查看英文原文

    I think he kind of missed the elephant that is modern communication technology has reduced the marginal cost of skilled services enabling pretty much every object designed in an office and manufactured in a factory to benefit from a broader array of engineering and design professionals and methodologies. The average product and service that the average actor in the economy interacts with is designed and optimized to a far greater degree today than they were historically. Look at the bottle of Elmers glue on the table. Today the glue probably works better (barring regulation that forces compromises to product efficacy) and comes in a bottle that uses half as much plastic. Something like a bottle revision that would have formerly required expensive salaried employees to come up with multiple options, send them to the supplier, supplier has to respond to each with details and quotes, etc, can now be accomplished in a fraction of the man hours thanks to email and CAD being ubiquitous in the entire supply chain from marketing, to engineering, to the vendor's contractor who will actually design the tooling. Sign off might take days instead of weeks. This sort of efficiency improvement allows more engineering, design work, or other optimization to be done to every good and service in our economy allowing it to penetrate into even the most thin margin use cases. From farming to high finance products and services are substantially more influenced and optimized by specialist professionals than they were in 1990. Increase efficiency like this throughout the national and global economy is how lawnmowers and A/C units can be sold on sale for $100 and still make a profit. (yes I know that example isn't perfect but you get the point).

    用版权到期判断公共领域扩大是误导,网络私有化和集中化更值得关注。

    这让我想起黄金时代的博客文章,清单原来是被低估的文学装置。这里有些有趣可争议的点:用版权到期判断公共领域扩大可能是误导。更广义看,公共领域并未更丰富;1999年的网络小得多但更公共,今天的网络更集中、受控、私有化,内容、连接和信号都成了专有财产。版权到期只是很小可识别的一部分。

    dalbasal查看英文原文

    This reminds me of a golden age blog post, when lists turned out to be an understudied literary device. I'm a fan of "dumps." Some interestingly debatable ones here: "Intellectual Property Maximalism rollback: copyright terms have not and probably will not be indefinitely extended again to eternity to protect Mickey Mouse, and in 2019, for the first time since 1998, works entered the public domain" I think the easy indicator may be the wrong one here. Defined more broadly, the public domain is not being enriched. For example, the web was a lot smaller in 1999, but it was a much more public domain. Today's web and post web internet is more centralised, controlled and therefore private property. Google could crawl pages, links, forums, because they were public, and use that access to create a search engine. Content, connections and signal are, today, proprietary. You can't order the world's information if that information is facebook's, only facebook can. Or patents, more stuff of the last generation is patented than the previous'. Does that mean we invented more or we patented more? What happens to stuff that doesn't get patented? It's public. Old copyright expiry deadlines might be a symbolic lead indicator, but they're determining the location of a fence post in county scale land dispute. A tiny, legible, part of the whole. In real terms, Disney's copyright portfolio is worth more, not less.

    环境改善部分是把污染外包给发展中国家,不能简单归功技术进步。

    环境:大多数地方空气质量持续改善(考虑到空气污染危害证据增多,这可能是整页最重要的一项),森林面积增加,更多河流可安全钓鱼。因为几乎所有污染水和大气的工业生产都转移到第三世界,那里的人承受污染。垃圾也被运到中国、印度、印尼“回收”,实则焚烧或扔进海洋。我不认为这算技术进步带来的改善。

    anticodon查看英文原文

    Environment: air quality in most places has continued to improve (and considering the growing evidence on the harms of air pollution, this may well be the single most important item on this whole page), forest area has increased , and more rivers are safe to fish in Because almost all the industrial production that pollutes water and air moved to third-world countries, where people suffer from pollution. Same for thrash that is taken to China, India, Indonesia for "recycling", but is actually burned in fires or thrown into the ocean. I wouldn't consider it an improvement due to advances in technology.

    客观改善不等于主观幸福,便利和数字化带来新的焦虑与代价。

    一个可能引起共鸣的反驳:我感觉比1990年代更没希望。那时很多重要领域似乎正朝正确方向走;现在我严重焦虑孩子30年内会不会生活在反乌托邦。许多改善减少麻烦却增加焦虑;1995年我完全不担心身份被盗,过去10年我被盗3次,带来大量焦虑和麻烦。很多便利改善像是糟糕交易,信息和服务一键可得几乎成了负担,一切都要即时,这对我的心理是负面的。

    chasingthewind查看英文原文

    A counterpoint to this that may resonate with some: * I _feel_ significantly less hopeful than I did in the 1990s. Things _seemed_ to be heading in the right direction in lots of important areas then. Now I feel significant anxiety about whether my kids will live in a dystopia within the next 30 years * Many of the improvements listed reduce hassle and stress in some ways, and markedly increase stress and anxiety in other ways. I had ZERO concern about my identity being stolen in 1995. My identity has now been stolen 3x in the last 10 years and caused significant anxiety and hassle. * Many of the improvements to convenience feel like a bad trade. Having information and services a click away has begun to feel almost like a burden. Everything has to happen instantly now. This has been a negative from a psychological perspective for me. ---- I know some of this is just that I'm 25 years older and I'm trying to subtract that out. I understand that objectively this is a good time to be alive in many, many ways but I feel significantly worse than I did then. If I could return to the 1990s at my current age I would do so in a heartbeat.

    历次讨论

    同类还值得读

    1. 保持你的身份认同足够小

      Keep Your Identity Small (2009)

      Paul Graham 2009 年的一篇短文:人一旦把某个话题当成自己身份的一部分(宗教、政治、编程语言皆然),讨论就会退化成站队和争吵,因为此时争论的不再是事实,而是"我是谁…

      思考与写作上首页 5 次 · 2009–2021paulgraham.com编辑精选
    2. 苏格拉底式教学法:通过提问而非讲授来教学

      The Socratic Method: Teaching by Asking Instead of by Telling

      记录了作者用纯提问的方式,引导一群小学生从零推导出二进制计数法的课堂实验,展示了苏格拉底式教学法的惊人效果。

      思考与写作上首页 5 次 · 2011–2022garlikov.com
    3. 你不能说的话

      What You Can't Say (2004)

      Paul Graham 2004 年的经典文章,探讨那些因道德时尚而不能公开说出的观点。

      思考与写作上首页 5 次 · 2014–2022paulgraham.com编辑精选
    4. 龙暴君的寓言(2005)

      The Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant (2005)

      哲学家 Nick Bostrom 于 2005 年写的一则寓言:一条每天吞噬数千人的巨龙(隐喻死亡与衰老)长期被人类当作不可抗拒的自然规律接受,直到有人提出并最终用导弹将其杀死,…

      思考与写作上首页 5 次 · 2009–2021nickbostrom.com编辑精选
    5. 现实有着惊人的细节量

      Reality has a surprising amount of detail (2017)

      2017 年的博文指出,现实远比我们以为的充满细节:我们习惯用简化的心智模型看世界,直到真正动手做事(比如作者举的造楼梯例子)才发现处处是未曾预料的细节。

      思考与写作上首页 4 次 · 2018–2025johnsalvatier.org编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。