HackerURLs

一次又一次被重新发现的经典。

同一个链接,相隔一年以上,一次又一次被人重新发现、再次冲上 Hacker News 首页。能经受住这种时间检验的,大多是值得一读再读的文章。每篇附中文标题,讨论最热的那些再加上中文导读和高赞评论翻译。

从名人堂开始
  • 4,700+篇经过时间检验的经典

Hall of fame

名人堂

在经典库里看全部精选

上首页次数最多、而且有中文导读的 30 篇。时间轴上每个黑点是一次上首页,空心点是一次没冲上去的投稿。

  1. 正在载入经典…

Archive

经典库

按第一次上首页的年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些经典是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      合并同一个链接

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部链接投稿,把 http/https、www、跟踪参数等写法不同的同一篇文章合并成一条。

    2. 02

      只留经得起时间的

      同一链接至少两次拿到 50 分以上(约等于上首页),而且两次相隔一年以上;再由 AI 剔除状态页、产品首页和新闻事件。

    3. 03

      写导读、译评论

      上首页次数最多的 2,000 篇配上中文导读、"为什么经久不衰",并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。导读由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    互联网与文化intuitiveexplanations.com

    Replit 用法律威胁扼杀我的开源项目

    Replit used legal threats to kill my open-source project

    3次上首页
    3年跨度
    4,514累计得分
    1,503条评论

    2021 — 2024,它一次次回到首页

    黑点是上首页(≥ 50 分)的那次投稿,空心点是没冲上去的投稿,点越大分数越高。

    导读

    一位前 Replit 实习生开发的开源项目因与 Replit 产品相似,遭到 CEO 以律师函相威胁,被迫下架。作者详细记录了整个事件经过,引发社区对大公司以法律手段压制个人开源项目的广泛批评。

    为什么经久不衰:它揭示了创业公司如何用法律恐吓扼杀开源项目,也提醒开发者面对空洞的法律威胁时不必轻易屈服,多年后仍是处理类似冲突的参考案例。

    关键词 开源法律威胁Replit知识产权

    HN 评论精选

    空洞的法律威胁只是恐吓,作者不该立刻屈服

    CEO 威胁要找律师审查、指责你行为不当,这是在操纵和恐吓你,而且成功了。各位读者:不要怕律师。律师不喜欢输官司,不会推进注定失败的案子;在对方律师真正表明有案可立之前,一切都是虚张声势。正确做法是表明善意、不认错、不道歉、无视人身攻击,等对方采取实际行动再说。

    codingdave查看英文原文

    > Naturally, I took down my project right away... So a CEO bullied you. He threatened to have lawyers look at something, accused you of behaving poorly, and accused you of being difficult. He is being manipulative. He is trying to guilt / scare you into stopping. And it worked. For all readers... do not be afraid of lawyers. Especially if nobody has even talked to them yet. Lawyers do not like to lose cases, so will not push a losing agenda. Yet they also must do what their client asks, so lawyers looking into a concern, or even sending nastygrams... those are meaningless actions. It only becomes meaningful if and when if their lawyers indicate they believe they really have a case, or if your own lawyer believes they have a case. Everything before that is posturing and bullying. If I were in the same situation as OP, I'd state that my intent was positive, ask to be informed of the results of discussions with attorneys, and wish them to have a nice day. Admit no wrong, make no apologies, ignore irrelevant statements (in particular personal attacks), and just let it slide until they take a real action of some kind. Once they do take an action, then it might be appropriate to do what they want. But seriously... stop letting people be bullies.

    指控知识产权盗窃却拿不出任何证据,极不负责

    每次这个话题出现我都要指出:Amjad 至今没有列出这个开源项目到底偷了什么。你不能指控一个刚起步的实习生窃取知识产权却不拿出证据。要么公开声明什么都没被偷,要么拿出证据。项目的提交历史是公开的,欢迎逐条指出哪里被偷了。

    ctvo查看英文原文

    Every time there's a thread on this I want to bring up the fact that Amjad still has not listed what this open source project stole. You cannot go around accusing someone trying to start their career (this intern) of IP theft and not present evidence. Release a statement clearly stating NOTHING was stolen or release evidence. We have the public commit history of the project. Feel free to go through each commit and point out what was stolen from you.

    产品护城河如此之浅,才是真正的问题

    一家融资丰厚的公司被一个实习生的周末项目吓到,挺有意思的。如果你的护城河浅到几天就能被复制,这个开源项目恐怕是你最不用担心的问题。

    yellow_lead查看英文原文

    A fancy funded company like Replit getting scared by an intern's weekend project is entertaining. If your moat is so low it can be replicated in a few days, I think this open source project is the least of their worries.

    CEO 本可善意沟通甚至邀请合作,却选择攻击

    最疯狂的是 CEO 本可以用更有说服力的方式表达观点,比如'很酷的项目,不过前实习生发布和实习工作如此相似的东西让我有点纠结,但欢迎你回来和我们一起继续做'——这样至少能赢得同情。结果他却全面开战、搬出律师,实在是不知分寸。

    2bitencryption查看英文原文

    The craziest part, to me, is how the CEO could have expressed his view in a way that would have been much more compelling. "Hey, really cool project. Though honestly, not sure how I feel about a former intern of mine publishing a project that is so similar to what they worked on as an intern. But on that note, we'd be happy to have you back on the team if you want to continue the project with us :) What do you say?" or something along those lines. I still wouldn't agree with him, but at least I'd sympathize. instead he went full-on attack mode, lawyers and all. sheesh. talk about tone deaf.

    历次讨论

    同类还值得读

    1. 如今电脑上几乎所有操作在感知上都比 1983 年更慢(2017)

      Almost everything on computers is perceptually slower than it was in 1983 (2017)

      2017 年的推文串认为,尽管计算机硬件比 1983 年快得多,日常操作的感知速度却常常更慢:启动、界面响应和网络应用被层层抽象、动画、后台检查与网络依赖拖累。

      互联网与文化上首页 5 次 · 2017–2020twitter.com
    2. 网站肥胖危机

      The Website Obesity Crisis

      Maciej Cegłowski(idlewords)的经典演讲文稿《网站肥胖症危机》,批评现代网页越来越臃肿:动辄数 MB 的 JavaScript、追踪脚本和广告,把本可以轻…

      互联网与文化上首页 5 次 · 2016–2021idlewords.com编辑精选
    3. 亚马逊那本标价 23,698,655.93 美元的苍蝇书

      Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies

      博文讲的是亚马逊上一本关于果蝇的二手书被标到 23,698,655.93 美元。

      互联网与文化上首页 5 次 · 2011–2022michaeleisen.org
    4. 浏览器 User-Agent 字符串的历史

      History of the browser user-agent string (2008)

      2008 年的经典文章用戏谑的“创世纪”口吻,讲述浏览器 User-Agent 字符串如何从简单的标识演变成层层叠加的伪装:浏览器为了绕过按 UA 分发的网站检测,纷纷把自己伪装…

      互联网与文化上首页 5 次 · 2012–2022webaim.org编辑精选
    5. 最后的问题——艾萨克·阿西莫夫

      The Last Question - Isaac Asimov

      阿西莫夫最著名的短篇科幻小说《最后的问题》的在线全文。

      互联网与文化上首页 5 次 · 2009–2019multivax.com编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。