HackerURLs

一次又一次被重新发现的经典。

同一个链接,相隔一年以上,一次又一次被人重新发现、再次冲上 Hacker News 首页。能经受住这种时间检验的,大多是值得一读再读的文章。每篇附中文标题,讨论最热的那些再加上中文导读和高赞评论翻译。

从名人堂开始
  • 4,700+篇经过时间检验的经典

Hall of fame

名人堂

在经典库里看全部精选

上首页次数最多、而且有中文导读的 30 篇。时间轴上每个黑点是一次上首页,空心点是一次没冲上去的投稿。

  1. 正在载入经典…

Archive

经典库

按第一次上首页的年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些经典是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      合并同一个链接

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部链接投稿,把 http/https、www、跟踪参数等写法不同的同一篇文章合并成一条。

    2. 02

      只留经得起时间的

      同一链接至少两次拿到 50 分以上(约等于上首页),而且两次相隔一年以上;再由 AI 剔除状态页、产品首页和新闻事件。

    3. 03

      写导读、译评论

      上首页次数最多的 2,000 篇配上中文导读、"为什么经久不衰",并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。导读由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    编程与软件工程ics.uci.edu

    Oberon:被忽视的瑰宝 [PDF]

    Oberon – The Overlooked Jewel [pdf]

    3次上首页
    2年跨度
    187累计得分
    118条评论

    2011 — 2013,它一次次回到首页

    黑点是上首页(≥ 50 分)的那次投稿,空心点是没冲上去的投稿,点越大分数越高。

    导读

    本文是一篇探讨 Oberon 操作系统与编程语言的论文,介绍这个由 Niklaus Wirth 设计、长期被忽视的系统。Oberon 将操作系统、编译器和语言设计融为一体,诸多理念——如早期 JIT 编译、基于文本的可点击交互、极简的模块化结构——都远远超前于时代。

    为什么经久不衰:Oberon 展示了一种用安全系统编程语言构建完整操作系统的优雅路径,其极简而深远的设计从 JIT 到影响 Go 的方法绑定,至今仍在启发系统软件开发者。

    关键词 OberonNiklaus Wirth系统编程操作系统

    HN 评论精选

    Oberon 技术理念超前,作者发明了早期 JIT,且 Wirth 的多本著作至今仍极具参考价值。

    我曾试用过 Oberon,它远远超前于时代。论文作者不仅发明了最早的 JIT 编译系统之一,而且对系统编程语言来说,能用鼠标点击执行代码(类似 Rob Pike 的 ACME 编辑器)这一能力至今仍无人实现。Oberon 上还尝试过许多新颖的研究想法,比如有篇叫「Active Text」的论文允许把视频放进代码注释。所有讲解细节的书都强烈推荐:Wirth 的编译器书是经典的轻松入门(Oberon-0 语法只需两页!),他的算法书有些描述别处找不到,而《Project Oberon》则包含对系统软件独一无二的论述,例如实现文本编辑器的最佳数据结构 PieceLinkText(比 rope-strings 早很多)。

    sb查看英文原文

    I tried Oberon once and have to say that it was way ahead of its time. Not only did the author (of the linked paper) invent one of the first JIT compiled systems, but also the ability to execute code with a mouse click (similar to Rob Pike's ACME editor) is---for a systems programming language---still not available today. There were several novel research ideas tried for the Oberon system. I remember there was some paper called "Active Text" that allowed putting videos into code comments. (Probably that could have been done in Smalltalk, too.) Finally, all of the books explaining details are heartily recommended. Wirth's compiler book (referred to at HN several times) is a classic easy-going introduction (the Oberon-0 grammar fits on only two pages IIRC! [1]), his algorithm book (also available for download, also referred to multiple times at HN) has some of the nicest descriptions that I did not find anywhere else (showing a divide-and-conquer approach to computing the median [near the Quicksort treatment]; plus polyphase sort, which might be useful again in data centers), and finally the Project Oberon book contains some unique treatment on system software that is not easily found anywhere else. For example, it contains the details on what's called PieceLinkText, which is the (at least AFAIK) best data structure to implement a text editor and it's operations. (Predating rope-strings by a fair amount of time, too.) edit: [1]: just checked my own copy; Oberon-0's grammar actually fits on one page, the full Oberon grammar fits on two pages! [2]: URLs: - Compiler book: http://www.ethoberon.ethz.ch/WirthPubl/CBEAll.pdf - Algorithm book: http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/wirth/books/AlgorithmE1/AD2012.pdf - Project Oberon: http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/wirth/books/ProjectOberon.pdf

    Project Oberon 一书在 550 页内附完整源码,清晰讲解编译器与操作系统设计。

    《Project Oberon: The Design of an Operating System and Compiler》一书详细讲解了 Oberon 编译器和操作系统的设计。它不仅写得清楚、解释明晰,而且在不到 550 页的篇幅里包含了编译器和操作系统的完整源代码!我从这本书中学到了一些有趣的编译技术。

    magoghm查看英文原文

    The book "Project Oberon: The Design of an Operating System and Compiler" http://www.amazon.com/Project-Oberon-Design-Operating-Compiler/dp/0201544288/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1366902572&sr=8-1&keywords=project+oberon contains a detailed explanation of the design for the Oberon compiler and operating system. Not only it is well written with clear explanations, but it also includes the full source code for the compiler and operating system in less than 550 pages! I learned some interesting compiler techniques from reading that book.

    Oberon 证明安全语言可做 OS,其模块化 UI 设计可扩展,且影响了 Go 的方法绑定。

    相当不错的系统,我大学时代还写过一个它的词法/语法分析器。它活生生证明了用安全的系统编程语言开发操作系统是可行的。Native Oberon 系统的使用体验很好,其 UI 概念映射到 Oberon 模块的方式使其具有很好的可扩展性。遗憾的是业界始终没有采用它。Go 中方法与类型关联的方式受到了 Oberon 语言家族的影响(参见 Component Pascal)。

    pjmlp查看英文原文

    Quite a nice system. I even wrote a lexer/parser for it back on my university days. It is the living proof that it is possible to use a safe systems programming language for operating system development. The Native Oberon system was quite nice to use in how the UI concepts would map to Oberon modules, as such it was quite extensible. Sadly, it never got picked up by the industry. The way methods are associated with types in Go has been influenced by Oberon language family (see Component Pascal).

    Pascal/Oberon 系语言因用户少且分支碎片化而衰落,官方资源也显得荒废。

    伴随 Borland Pascal 长大,我对 Pascal 及其衍生语言有感情。我喜欢用 BP 编程,也为 Pascal 衍生语言输给 C 衍生语言而有些不快。(我读过一些 Modula 3 的资料,对其模块系统颇感兴趣。)但用户少、碎片化严重(Borland Pascal/Delphi、Object Pascal、Component Pascal;Modula-2 和 Modula-3;Oberon、Oberon-2、Oberon-07、Active Oberon、Zonnon)。当所有这些语言加起来用户基数大概和 Common Lisp 一样「大」时,你该怎么选?而且 ETH 的 Oberon 网页看起来像废弃了一样。

    zvrba查看英文原文

    Having grown up on Borland Pascal, I have a sentiment for Pascal and its derivatives. I enjoyed programming in BP, and I'm not too happy that Pascal derivatives lost their popularity to C derivatives. (I was reading a bit about Modula 3 and got quite intrigued by its module system.) But, users are few, fragmentation is high (Borland Pascal/Delphi, Object Pascal, Component Pascal; Modula-2 and Modula-3; Oberon, Oberon-2, Oberon-07, Active Oberon, Zonnon). How the heck are you supposed to choose when all those languages taken together have probaby about user base as "large" as that of common lisp? Plus, Oberon webpages at ETH look like abandoned.

    历次讨论

    同类还值得读

    1. 开源应用架构

      The Architecture of Open Source Applications

      《开源软件架构》(AOSA)是一本在线免费书,邀请知名开源项目的作者亲自剖析其内部设计,涵盖 SQLAlchemy、LLVM、Audacity、Apache、Bash 等系统。

      编程与软件工程上首页 9 次 · 2011–2024aosabook.org编辑精选
    2. 编程语言简史:简短、不完整且多半错误

      A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages

      一篇以戏谑、故意不准确的方式回顾编程语言史的博客文章,用夸张轶事和讽刺定义串起 Lisp、C、C++、Java、JavaScript、PHP 等语言。

      编程与软件工程上首页 8 次 · 2009–2021james-iry.blogspot.com
    3. SQLite 是如何测试的

      How SQLite is tested

      SQLite 官方文档页,系统介绍 SQLite 的测试体系:多种测试方法(TCL 测试、模糊测试、回归测试、静态分析等)和海量测试用例,展示了这个小型开源项目如何靠极致测试获得…

      编程与软件工程上首页 8 次 · 2009–2025sqlite.org编辑精选
    4. 高级编程语言(2009)

      Advanced programming languages (2009)

      Matt Might 的经典文章,按用途推荐“高级编程语言”:如果追求就业就选主流语言,如果追求表达力、学术研究或创业,则推荐 Haskell、OCaml、Scala 等函数式语…

      编程与软件工程上首页 8 次 · 2009–2022matt.might.net
    5. 我的 Forth 与栈机器经历

      Yosefk - My history with Forth & stack machines

      作者以亲身经历回顾了使用 Forth 语言和栈式机器的历程:既赞叹其简洁优雅、代码量小、可自举的优点,也坦率指出栈操作在实际编程中的痛苦,以及 Forth 社区文化中的问题。

      编程与软件工程上首页 8 次 · 2010–2024yosefk.com编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。