HackerURLs

一次又一次被重新发现的经典。

同一个链接,相隔一年以上,一次又一次被人重新发现、再次冲上 Hacker News 首页。能经受住这种时间检验的,大多是值得一读再读的文章。每篇附中文标题,讨论最热的那些再加上中文导读和高赞评论翻译。

从名人堂开始
  • 4,700+篇经过时间检验的经典

Hall of fame

名人堂

在经典库里看全部精选

上首页次数最多、而且有中文导读的 30 篇。时间轴上每个黑点是一次上首页,空心点是一次没冲上去的投稿。

  1. 正在载入经典…

Archive

经典库

按第一次上首页的年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些经典是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      合并同一个链接

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部链接投稿,把 http/https、www、跟踪参数等写法不同的同一篇文章合并成一条。

    2. 02

      只留经得起时间的

      同一链接至少两次拿到 50 分以上(约等于上首页),而且两次相隔一年以上;再由 AI 剔除状态页、产品首页和新闻事件。

    3. 03

      写导读、译评论

      上首页次数最多的 2,000 篇配上中文导读、"为什么经久不衰",并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。导读由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    职业与工作方法spectrum.ieee.org

    STEM 人才危机是个神话

    The STEM Crisis is a Myth

    3次上首页
    6年跨度
    338累计得分
    449条评论

    2013 — 2019,它一次次回到首页

    黑点是上首页(≥ 50 分)的那次投稿,空心点是没冲上去的投稿,点越大分数越高。

    导读

    这篇 IEEE Spectrum 的文章指出,所谓“STEM 危机”(理工科人才严重短缺)其实是个迷思:判断短缺最直接的指标应是 STEM 从业者工资普遍上涨,但现实中并未出现。文章认为这种说法更多是利益相关方(企业、教育机构等)推动的叙事,用于争取签证政策和教育经费。

    为什么经久不衰:它用工资数据这一硬指标戳破了“人才短缺”的流行叙事,而这一争论在 H-1B 签证、科技行业招聘等话题上至今仍在反复上演。

    关键词 STEM 危机人才短缺工资数据H-1B 签证

    HN 评论精选

    平均工资掩盖了真实涨薪,分群体看数据可知开发者并不过剩

    “技术从业者工资没涨”常用平均值来证明,但这个平均值被快速涌入的年轻新人拉低了——新人工资低于在职者均值,掩盖了实际涨薪。看具体群体数据就能验证:斯坦福 CS 本科生起薪四年间涨了 25% 以上,实习生工资甚至超过他当年毕业时对职业中期的预期。

    patio11查看英文原文

    "Wages for technologists have not increased" is often evidenced by claims about averages. By the same token, one could argue persuasively that devs do not age, because a year goes by and they get a few months younger. The explanation is that the number of devs (and many related trades) is increasing rapidly, largely driven by hires of young neophytes rather than retraining of e.g. 50 year old lawyers. The neophytes are younger and have lower wages than the mean dev. This brings the average down faster than raises and aging bring the average up. You can verify this if you look at data for particular career cohorts, either people or experience levels. In the 4 years I've been on HN the quotes I hear for "generic CS undergrad from Stanford" are up more than 25% (80k to 110k or so, starting salary offer). Companies that I work with complain bitterly that their competitors are bidding irresponsibly. The going wages for interns are substantially in excess of what I expected to earn in mid career when I graduate not even 10 years ago. Also, anecdotally, of the couple hundred people whose professional statuses I'm routinely exposed to I don't think I've ever heard "Boo, got to take a pay cut" except for making the BigCo to startup or self-employment transition.

    STEM 内部薪酬差异巨大,笼统谈短缺没有意义

    不同 STEM 学科之间薪酬差距巨大,这清楚地显示了需求所在:生物学家在争夺日益缩减的政府经费,而石油工程学生起薪就有 9 万美元。把 STEM 当作同质整体,会伤害冷门领域,也无法解决部分领域的真正短缺。

    linkregister查看英文原文

    "That report argued that the best indicator of a shortfall would be a widespread rise in salaries throughout the STEM community. But the price of labor has not risen, as you would expect it to do if STEM workers were scarce." The huge disparity of pay between different STEM disciplines should clearly show where the demand is. Biologists compete over shrinking government grants, while petroleum engineering students receive job offers of $90K starting. Treating STEM as a homogenous bloc will hurt the less in-demand fields while failing to treat the shortfall in others.

    所谓短缺是雇主不切实际的“摇滚明星”要求造成的

    作为移民我也同意:短缺很大程度是自找的。确实缺少能立即上手的人,但雇主从不肯降低“会 15 分钟内手写合并 k 个有序数组、有应用编程博士学位的摇滚明星程序员”这类要求。现实是大多数公司平庸至极,不是人才短缺,是你的公司烂、面试烂、没人想去。

    NTDF9查看英文原文

    Even as an immigrant to the US, I agree with this. A large part of the shortage is self-inflicted. Did we see a shortage of American workers who could do the job right away? YES. Not many people work in the same area of technology. There really aren't many people working in some areas of tech. Did the employer try to compromise on their requirement of "rockstar coder with 1000 wpm typing speed, PhD in app programming, merge k-sorted arrays in 15 mins with good syntax and no compiler?" NO. And this is why there is no shortage. It's their demand for rockstars when reality is most companies are mediocre (at best). It's not shortage, your company sucks, interviews suck and nobody wants to work there.

    缺的不是人才,是廉价人才

    并不缺 STEM 毕业生,但从雇主角度看,缺的是“廉价的”STEM 毕业生。这也是近期科技公司因技术签证政策变动而大闹的原因。

    RachelF查看英文原文

    There is not a shortage of STEM graduates. However, from an employer's point of view, there is a shortage of cheap STEM graduates. Hence the recent tech company uproar over the skilled visa changes.

    历次讨论

    同类还值得读

    1. 用十年时间自学编程(1998)

      Teach Yourself Programming in Ten Years (1998)

      Peter Norvig 1998 年的经典文章,回应“21天/24小时学会编程”一类速成书,主张真正精通编程需要约十年持续、有意识的练习。

      职业与工作方法上首页 11 次 · 2007–2025norvig.com编辑精选
    2. 如何成为一名程序员:简短、全面而个人的总结

      How to be a Programmer: A Short, Comprehensive, and Personal Summary

      一篇广为流传的程序员成长指南,作者以个人经验系统总结了成为优秀程序员所需的各项技能——从调试、测试、沟通到团队协作与身心健康。

      职业与工作方法上首页 6 次 · 2008–2015samizdat.mines.edu编辑精选
    3. 不要自称程序员

      Don't Call Yourself a Programmer

      经典职业建议文章劝软件工程师不要把自己局限在“程序员”这个标签上,而要从公司业务角度说明自己创造的价值;文中讨论了成本中心与利润中心、头衔、求职与职业选择,也顺带批评了学术界的价…

      职业与工作方法上首页 5 次 · 2011–2021kalzumeus.com编辑精选
    4. 创作者的日程与经理的日程

      Maker's Schedule, Manager's Schedule (2009)

      Paul Graham 在这篇文章里把时间表分成两类:管理者的日程以小时为单位,会议可以填满一天;创作者(程序员、写作者等)的日程则以半天为单位,需要长时间不被打断的连续块。

      职业与工作方法上首页 5 次 · 2009–2021paulgraham.com编辑精选
    5. 为什么程序员的薪酬不与生产力成正比

      Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their productivity

      讨论为什么程序员的薪酬往往不随其生产力成比例增长:生产力难以客观量化,薪酬更多受组织预算、岗位定价和个人议价能力影响。

      职业与工作方法上首页 5 次 · 2009–2022johndcook.com

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。